Orient, a subsidiary of Seiko Epson, has carved a niche for itself in the world of affordable, reliable automatic divers. Two of their most popular offerings are the Orient Kamasu and the Orient Mako (often referred to as the Mako II).
Both boast impressive specs for the price, diver-friendly features, and a stylish aesthetic. But with some key differences, choosing between the Kamasu and Mako can be a delightful dilemma. This comprehensive guide will dissect both watches, helping you select the perfect timepiece for your aquatic adventures (or everyday wear).
Movement and Functionality: The Beating Heart
Both the Kamasu and Mako are powered by the in-house Orient F6922 automatic movement. This tried-and-tested caliber offers a respectable 40-hour power reserve, hand winding, and hacking seconds (the ability to stop the second hand for precise time setting). It’s a workhorse movement known for its accuracy and durability, making it ideal for everyday wear and even light diving.
| Feature | Orient Kamasu | Orient Mako II |
|---|---|---|
| Movement | F6922 Automatic | F6922 Automatic |
| Power Reserve | 40 hours | 40 hours |
| Hand Winding | Yes | Yes |
| Hacking Seconds | Yes | Yes |
| Jewels | 21 | 21 |
While the core functionality remains identical, there are minor variations in how the time is displayed. The Kamasu features a more modern, arrow-shaped hour hand, while the Mako retains a classic sword-shaped hand. This is purely an aesthetic difference and won’t impact performance.
Case and Crystal: Protection and Clarity
The Kamasu and Mako share a similar case size of 42mm, making them suitable for most wrist sizes. However, the Kamasu has a slightly thicker case (12.8mm) compared to the Mako’s 12.6mm. This subtle difference might be noticeable on some wrists. Both watches are constructed from solid stainless steel, ensuring robustness and corrosion resistance for underwater exploration.
The most significant distinction lies in the crystal. The Kamasu boasts a scratch-resistant sapphire crystal, a premium material highly sought after for its durability and clarity. The Mako, on the other hand, utilizes a mineral crystal, which is more prone to scratches but remains perfectly functional for everyday use.
| Feature | Orient Kamasu | Orient Mako II |
|---|---|---|
| Case Material | Stainless Steel | Stainless Steel |
| Case Diameter | 42mm | 42mm |
| Case Thickness | 12.8mm | 12.6mm |
| Crystal | Sapphire | Mineral |
Bezel and Functionality: Turning the Tide
The bezel plays a crucial role in a diver’s watch, allowing divers to track elapsed dive time. Both the Kamasu and Mako feature unidirectional bezels that rotate counter-clockwise only, preventing accidental time adjustments underwater. The bezel markings are clear and easy to read, with 60-minute graduations for precise timing.
However, some users report that the Mako’s bezel can be slightly more challenging to grip due to its sloped design. The Kamasu’s bezel features a thicker, more pronounced grip, potentially offering easier manipulation with wet gloves.
| Feature | Orient Kamasu | Orient Mako II |
|---|---|---|
| Bezel Type | Unidirectional | Unidirectional |
| Bezel Rotation | Counter-clockwise | Counter-clockwise |
| Bezel Markings | 60-minute graduations | 60-minute graduations |
| Bezel Grip | Thicker, more pronounced | Sloped design |
Dial Design: A Matter of Preference
The dial aesthetics are where the Kamasu and Mako truly diverge. The Kamasu offers a cleaner, more modern look. It lacks a chapter ring (the ring with minute markers) around the dial, allowing for a larger and more prominent display of the hour markers and hands. The applied hour markers are bold and legible, with a generous application of luminous paint for low-light visibility.
The Mako embraces a more classic diver aesthetic. It features a chapter ring with minute markers and a wave pattern design. The hour markers are smaller and integrated into the dial itself. While still functional, the overall dial layout might feel a touch busier compared to the Kamasu. Both models come in a variety of dial colors, allowing you to personalize your choice.
| Feature | Orient Kamasu | Orient Mako II |
|---|---|---|
| Chapter Ring | No | Yes |
| Hour Marker Style | Applied, bold | Integrated, smaller |
| Dial Design | Clean, modern | Classic diver aesthetic |
Water Resistance: Ready to Dive Deep
Both the Kamasu and Mako boast an impressive 200 meters (660 feet) of water resistance. This qualifies them as certified diver watches, suitable for recreational diving activities. They can handle splashes, swimming, snorkeling, and even deeper dives with proper training and equipment.
While both watches share the same water resistance rating, it’s important to remember that everyday use can put a strain on gaskets and seals. Regularly servicing your watch, which should include pressure testing, is crucial for maintaining optimal water resistance over time.
Bracelet and Strap Options: Comfort on Land and Sea
The standard options for both watches are stainless steel bracelets with solid end links and a fold-over clasp with double safety push buttons. These bracelets offer a secure and comfortable fit, ideal for everyday wear. Both models also come with options for rubber straps, which provide a more flexible and water-friendly alternative for active lifestyles or diving.
The bracelet on the Mako II features solid end links, which contribute to a more robust and finished look. The Kamasu utilizes hollow end links, which are slightly lighter but might feel less substantial to some wearers. Ultimately, the choice between bracelet or strap, and even aftermarket options, comes down to personal preference and intended use.
| Feature | Orient Kamasu | Orient Mako II |
|---|---|---|
| Standard Band | Stainless Steel Bracelet | Stainless Steel Bracelet |
| Alternative Band Option | Rubber Strap | Rubber Strap |
| Bracelet End Links | Hollow | Solid |
Luminescence: Shining a Light in the Dark
Both the Kamasu and Mako utilize Lumibrite, Orient’s proprietary luminous paint, on the hands and hour markers. Lumibrite offers decent lume performance, glowing brightly after exposure to light and remaining legible for several hours in low-light conditions. While not the absolute best lume on the market, it’s sufficient for most underwater applications and nighttime visibility.
Some users report that the Kamasu’s lume seems to last slightly longer than the Mako’s. This could be due to a perceived difference in lume application or slight variations in Lumibrite formulation. Regardless, both watches provide adequate illumination for basic underwater visibility.
Price and Value Proposition: Where They Shine
The Orient Kamasu and Mako II typically fall within a similar price range, making them excellent value propositions for automatic divers. The Kamasu might hold a slight edge in perceived value due to its inclusion of a sapphire crystal. However, Mako’s established reputation and classic diver aesthetic also hold significant appeal.
Ultimately, the best value depends on your individual priorities. If a sapphire crystal is paramount, the Kamasu might be the better choice. If you prefer a classic diver look and don’t mind a mineral crystal, the Mako could be a more budget-friendly option.
| Feature | Orient Kamasu | Orient Mako II |
|---|---|---|
| Price Range | Similar | Similar |
| Value Proposition | Sapphire Crystal | Classic Diver Look |
Conclusion: Choosing Your Perfect Dive Companion
There’s no clear winner in the Orient Kamasu vs Orient Mako battle. Both watches excel in their own right. Here’s a quick breakdown to help you decide:
Choose the Kamasu if: You prioritize a scratch-resistant sapphire crystal, prefer a clean and modern dial design, and value a slightly easier grip on the bezel.
Choose the Mako II if: You prefer a classic diver aesthetic with a chapter ring, favor a slightly thinner case profile, and don’t mind a mineral crystal (which can still be quite durable).
Ultimately, the best choice comes down to personal preference and what features resonate most with you. Both the Kamasu and Mako offer exceptional value for the price, reliable functionality, and a stylish design. Whichever you choose, you’ll be getting a fantastic automatic diver ready to accompany you on your underwater adventures or everyday explorations.
FAQs
Which watch is more accurate?
Both the Kamasu and Mako utilize the same in-house Orient F6922 automatic movement, known for its accuracy and reliability. You can expect similar performance from both timepieces.
Is the sapphire crystal in the Kamasu worth the extra cost?
Sapphire crystals are significantly more scratch-resistant than mineral crystals used in the Mako. If you prioritize durability and clarity, the sapphire crystal in the Kamasu might be worth the slight price increase. However, mineral crystals are still functional for everyday wear.
Which watch is better for small wrists?
Both watches have a 42mm case diameter, which might feel large on smaller wrists. However, the Mako’s slightly thinner case profile (12.6mm) could offer a marginally better fit compared to the Kamasu’s 12.8mm thickness.
Is the lume on the Kamasu brighter than the Mako’s?
There are user reports suggesting the lume on the Kamasu lasts a bit longer than the Mako’s. This could be due to perceived differences or slight variations in Lumibrite application. Regardless, both watches provide adequate lume for basic underwater visibility.
Which watch has a more comfortable bracelet?
Both the Kamasu and Mako come with stainless steel bracelets. The key difference lies in the end links. The Mako’s solid end links offer a more robust feel, while the Kamasu’s hollow end links are slightly lighter. Ultimately, comfort is subjective, and trying on both watches if possible is recommended.